<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Android 2.0: Developers left in the dark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/</link>
	<description>Meet Your New Android Friend.  Your Community For All Things Google Android.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:21:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Android and Me</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-9092</link>
		<dc:creator>Android and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-9092</guid>
		<description>[...] pulled the big-brother act more than a couple of times recently (the above cease-and-desist, being very secretive with developers about Android 2.0, undermining bloggers with Sidewiki, and all sorts of craziness over Google Books) and a lot of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pulled the big-brother act more than a couple of times recently (the above cease-and-desist, being very secretive with developers about Android 2.0, undermining bloggers with Sidewiki, and all sorts of craziness over Google Books) and a lot of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android and Me</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-9040</link>
		<dc:creator>Android and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-9040</guid>
		<description>[...] day after we called out Google for holding onto the Android 2.0 SDK, it magically appeared on their website. Developers can now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] day after we called out Google for holding onto the Android 2.0 SDK, it magically appeared on their website. Developers can now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artar</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-9037</link>
		<dc:creator>artar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-9037</guid>
		<description>http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-support-in-sdk.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-support-in-sdk.html" rel="nofollow">http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-android-20-support-in-sdk.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android and Me</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>Android and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>[...] and the first phone featuring the new OS (Verizon Droid) will be in customers hand on November 6. Developers feel left in the dark because Google has failed to publicly release the Android 2.0 SDK or comment on the upcoming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the first phone featuring the new OS (Verizon Droid) will be in customers hand on November 6. Developers feel left in the dark because Google has failed to publicly release the Android 2.0 SDK or comment on the upcoming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brynthe</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-8937</link>
		<dc:creator>Brynthe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-8937</guid>
		<description>See... i don&#039;t doubt that the guys there just completely overlooked that thousands of apps may be out of the loop... they are not complete screw ups...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See&#8230; i don&#8217;t doubt that the guys there just completely overlooked that thousands of apps may be out of the loop&#8230; they are not complete screw ups&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Shapcott</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-8936</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Shapcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-8936</guid>
		<description>Cyaonogen includes a compatibility mode toggle in Spare Parts. I believe that Android 1.6 (Donut) automatically uses compatibility mode and Spare Parts let&#039;s you turn it off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyaonogen includes a compatibility mode toggle in Spare Parts. I believe that Android 1.6 (Donut) automatically uses compatibility mode and Spare Parts let&#8217;s you turn it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Wimberly</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-8935</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Wimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-8935</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 99% sure I saw a &quot;compatibility mode&quot; in early Donut/Eclair builds. I will try to dig up a screen shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 99% sure I saw a &#8220;compatibility mode&#8221; in early Donut/Eclair builds. I will try to dig up a screen shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brynthe</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-8934</link>
		<dc:creator>Brynthe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-8934</guid>
		<description>Maybe just maybe android 2.0 is going to be fully compatible with majority of the apps. dont forget that only a very few and particular types of apps broke on 1.6...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe just maybe android 2.0 is going to be fully compatible with majority of the apps. dont forget that only a very few and particular types of apps broke on 1.6&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomTasche</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-8933</link>
		<dc:creator>TomTasche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-8933</guid>
		<description>http://twitter.com/hexage/status/5180768875

sounds like THEY have access to Android 2.0? :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/hexage/status/5180768875" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/hexage/status/5180768875</a></p>
<p>sounds like THEY have access to Android 2.0? :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Shapcott</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/android-2-0-developers-left-in-the-dark/#comment-8928</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Shapcott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=6502#comment-8928</guid>
		<description>Of course we want a stable API. Consider though that if the Motorola Droid is actually to come out on November 6th, one would sure hope that Android 2.0 (and its equivalent SDK) is done by now. We need access to that SDK prior to the release so that we can check for those broken API methods, plain and simple.

Forgive me if I misinterpreted the tone of your response... It&#039;s hard to tell the exact angle you are taking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we want a stable API. Consider though that if the Motorola Droid is actually to come out on November 6th, one would sure hope that Android 2.0 (and its equivalent SDK) is done by now. We need access to that SDK prior to the release so that we can check for those broken API methods, plain and simple.</p>
<p>Forgive me if I misinterpreted the tone of your response&#8230; It&#8217;s hard to tell the exact angle you are taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
