<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Android Market: Agree to new terms or we unpublish your app</title>
	<atom:link href="http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/</link>
	<description>Meet Your New Android Friend.  Your Community For All Things Google Android.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:01:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Applications PDA: Des changements dans Android Market : accepte-les ou nous retirons ton application</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-18765</link>
		<dc:creator>Applications PDA: Des changements dans Android Market : accepte-les ou nous retirons ton application</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-18765</guid>
		<description>[...] mobile et ils l&#039;ont déjà démontré dans son affrontement absurde contre Cyanogen.  Une voie AndroidAndME   (cc) Mauro pour Celularis, 2009. &#124; le Lien direct &#124; laisse ton opinion! &#124; l&#039;Envoie à del.icio.us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mobile et ils l&#39;ont déjà démontré dans son affrontement absurde contre Cyanogen.  Une voie AndroidAndME   (cc) Mauro pour Celularis, 2009. | le Lien direct | laisse ton opinion! | l&#39;Envoie à del.icio.us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Cape</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-11366</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Cape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-11366</guid>
		<description>Wow, Androids getting stricter, hopefully they don&#039;t become like apple!

Anyways, now you can develop cross platform native apps with Titanium, all you have to know is HTML, CSS and Javascript, check it out:

http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-mobile/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Androids getting stricter, hopefully they don&#8217;t become like apple!</p>
<p>Anyways, now you can develop cross platform native apps with Titanium, all you have to know is HTML, CSS and Javascript, check it out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-mobile/" rel="nofollow">http://www.appcelerator.com/products/titanium-mobile/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Big Iron Guy</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-10934</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Big Iron Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-10934</guid>
		<description>Javacool Software, LLC, http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/ makes and application called EULAlyzer, which does what you expect, analyze EULA&#039;s. (They also make SpywareBlaster.) Now a developer agreement isn&#039;t an EULA, but it is similar enough that when I ran it thru the free version of EULAlyzer, it reported as follows:
&lt;&gt;
Most of the time, FOSS licenses and simple agreements almost never return anything at or above &#039;elevated calculated interest&#039;. Makes me wonder if I want to DL the official SDK.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Javacool Software, LLC, <a href="http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/</a> makes and application called EULAlyzer, which does what you expect, analyze EULA&#8217;s. (They also make SpywareBlaster.) Now a developer agreement isn&#8217;t an EULA, but it is similar enough that when I ran it thru the free version of EULAlyzer, it reported as follows:<br />
&lt;&gt;<br />
Most of the time, FOSS licenses and simple agreements almost never return anything at or above &#8216;elevated calculated interest&#8217;. Makes me wonder if I want to DL the official SDK&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nEx.Software</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-10798</link>
		<dc:creator>nEx.Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-10798</guid>
		<description>Al Sutton has done a pretty good analysis of what he sees as the changes here: http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss/msg/d18f370d3ea6ca75

As he notes, he is not a lawyer so... Keep that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Sutton has done a pretty good analysis of what he sees as the changes here: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss/msg/d18f370d3ea6ca75" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss/msg/d18f370d3ea6ca75</a></p>
<p>As he notes, he is not a lawyer so&#8230; Keep that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Riley</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-10794</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-10794</guid>
		<description>The old policy defined it at 48 hours, however its only 24 hours via the market. So, if you forget to refund via market you have another 24 hours from the developer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old policy defined it at 48 hours, however its only 24 hours via the market. So, if you forget to refund via market you have another 24 hours from the developer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-10788</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-10788</guid>
		<description>This one says you must give refunds within 48 hours.  Isn&#039;t it currently 24 hours?  It&#039;s also not clear if it is changing the refund policy to 48 hours...or if it is just giving Google the option of changing it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one says you must give refunds within 48 hours.  Isn&#8217;t it currently 24 hours?  It&#8217;s also not clear if it is changing the refund policy to 48 hours&#8230;or if it is just giving Google the option of changing it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuksy</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-10786</link>
		<dc:creator>chuksy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-10786</guid>
		<description>Personally am not really bothered by the new agreement.If developers don&#039;t like the new agreement,there are alternative markets springing up left right and centre where they can publish there apps. 

That&#039;s the beauty of open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally am not really bothered by the new agreement.If developers don&#8217;t like the new agreement,there are alternative markets springing up left right and centre where they can publish there apps. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the beauty of open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schwiz</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-10781</link>
		<dc:creator>schwiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-10781</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t really read the first one either cause I was so excited to publish my first app, hopefully there is some kind of loop hole here to allow google to boot developers like M STAR LLC from the marketplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t really read the first one either cause I was so excited to publish my first app, hopefully there is some kind of loop hole here to allow google to boot developers like M STAR LLC from the marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolx</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-10780</link>
		<dc:creator>lolx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-10780</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this has something to do with the soon-to-be new ability to put Android apps on your TMO bill...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this has something to do with the soon-to-be new ability to put Android apps on your TMO bill&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gilbertorbea</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-market-agree-to-new-terms-or-we-unpublish-your-app/#comment-10779</link>
		<dc:creator>gilbertorbea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7426#comment-10779</guid>
		<description>Never said the openness was going completely up to the developer.. *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never said the openness was going completely up to the developer.. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
