<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Android rumor report: Motorola edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=android-rumor-report-motorola-edition</link>
	<description>Meet Your New Android Friend.  Your Community For All Things Google Android.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:50:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game scope</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-54817</link>
		<dc:creator>Game scope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 01:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-54817</guid>
		<description>[...] on bug fixes and the phone&#8217;s firmware version remains on Android 1.5. We first reported on the rumor that the CLIQ might be stuck on Android 1.5 and we have yet to see any new information to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-54817' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('54817', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-54817' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('54817', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-54817-total" >0</span></div><p>[...] on bug fixes and the phone&#8217;s firmware version remains on Android 1.5. We first reported on the rumor that the CLIQ might be stuck on Android 1.5 and we have yet to see any new information to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android and Me</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-17722</link>
		<dc:creator>Android and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-17722</guid>
		<description>[...] reliable sources that provided us with inside information that we leaked over and over and over and over. Not every single prediction came true (because many of them fell victim to delays), but the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-17722' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('17722', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-17722' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('17722', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-17722-total" >0</span></div><p>[...] reliable sources that provided us with inside information that we leaked over and over and over and over. Not every single prediction came true (because many of them fell victim to delays), but the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android and Me</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-12398</link>
		<dc:creator>Android and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-12398</guid>
		<description>[...] on bug fixes and the phone&#8217;s firmware version remains on Android 1.5. We first reported on the rumor that the CLIQ might be stuck on Android 1.5 and we have yet to see any new information to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-12398' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('12398', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-12398' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('12398', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-12398-total" >0</span></div><p>[...] on bug fixes and the phone&#8217;s firmware version remains on Android 1.5. We first reported on the rumor that the CLIQ might be stuck on Android 1.5 and we have yet to see any new information to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAG</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11115</link>
		<dc:creator>JAG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-11115</guid>
		<description>I wanna get the SHOLES TABLET this one looks great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-11115' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11115', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-11115' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11115', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-11115-total" >0</span></div><p>I wanna get the SHOLES TABLET this one looks great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11059</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-11059</guid>
		<description>Tailor: probably because this time the whole Eclair development was centered on the Droid. (Which could, in turn, be because the Dream will indeed have serious trouble running 2.0 without resorting to repartitioning or SD card help, but IMO it&#039;s most probably because they had a tight schedule and had to keep other manufacturers out of the process, as you have reported Samsung to have little knowledge about 2.0.)

nEx: indeed, the Galaxy doesn&#039;t seem to be a Google Experience device, my bad. But there&#039;s still the Samsung Moment, I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-11059' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11059', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-11059' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11059', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-11059-total" >0</span></div><p>Tailor: probably because this time the whole Eclair development was centered on the Droid. (Which could, in turn, be because the Dream will indeed have serious trouble running 2.0 without resorting to repartitioning or SD card help, but IMO it&#8217;s most probably because they had a tight schedule and had to keep other manufacturers out of the process, as you have reported Samsung to have little knowledge about 2.0.)</p>
<p>nEx: indeed, the Galaxy doesn&#8217;t seem to be a Google Experience device, my bad. But there&#8217;s still the Samsung Moment, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nEx.Software</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11042</link>
		<dc:creator>nEx.Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-11042</guid>
		<description>Galaxy is not a Google Experience device, which indicates that Samsung very well could have changed aspects of Android other than the GUI itself. In that case then it wouldn&#039;t necessarily be the Custom UI, but customization as a whole that hinders the update of these devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-11042' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11042', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-11042' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11042', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-11042-total" >0</span></div><p>Galaxy is not a Google Experience device, which indicates that Samsung very well could have changed aspects of Android other than the GUI itself. In that case then it wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be the Custom UI, but customization as a whole that hinders the update of these devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nEx.Software</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11041</link>
		<dc:creator>nEx.Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-11041</guid>
		<description>Your assessment of the Dream/Sapphire scenario seems entirely plausible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-11041' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11041', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-11041' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11041', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-11041-total" >0</span></div><p>Your assessment of the Dream/Sapphire scenario seems entirely plausible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Harris</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11040</link>
		<dc:creator>James Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-11040</guid>
		<description>You must work for Apple? Think of Android in the same way you think of Linux vs. Windows. The more options as handset manufacture has the better. They are the ones that are pushing the different flavors of Android, not Google. They clear feel that they are better off bringing to market a custom User experience than waiting on AT&amp;T to give up their exclusive on the iPhone. 

Not only that, but he reality is that we have yet to see what someone will build on top of Android that will change the game? Not an option on iPhone, you can only write apps! On Android you could create an amazing new phone experience. 

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love my iPhone, and Touch, etc. But I also like shopping in places that have more than one option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-11040' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11040', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-11040' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11040', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-11040-total" >0</span></div><p>You must work for Apple? Think of Android in the same way you think of Linux vs. Windows. The more options as handset manufacture has the better. They are the ones that are pushing the different flavors of Android, not Google. They clear feel that they are better off bringing to market a custom User experience than waiting on AT&amp;T to give up their exclusive on the iPhone. </p>
<p>Not only that, but he reality is that we have yet to see what someone will build on top of Android that will change the game? Not an option on iPhone, you can only write apps! On Android you could create an amazing new phone experience. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love my iPhone, and Touch, etc. But I also like shopping in places that have more than one option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Wimberly</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11039</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Wimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-11039</guid>
		<description>If your theory is ADP phones get routine updates, why has HTC not updated their drivers to support Android 2.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-11039' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11039', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-11039' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11039', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-11039-total" >0</span></div><p>If your theory is ADP phones get routine updates, why has HTC not updated their drivers to support Android 2.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/android-rumor-report-motorola-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-11037</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7522#comment-11037</guid>
		<description>To the best of my knowledge, the only devices that were regularly updated were the Dream and the Magic. Dream and Magic both happen to be regular stock Android phones, but they are NOT the only ones. The Galaxy is still stuck with 1.5, disproving this theory.

So, why did these two phones get updated? Could be because, y&#039;know, they happen to be the dev phones. They are ADP1, Ion, and also ADP2 now. So they have a very natural priority, as pretty much everyone working at Google on Android should have gotten at least one of these for free, and would be using it as their personal test hardware. As such, they will certainly solve any problems that prevents them from doing the testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CommentRating"><a class="rate-up" id='up-11037' alt='Thumb up' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11037', 'add', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_');" title="Vote Up" >Thumb up</a><a class="rate-down" id='down-11037' alt='Thumb down' onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('11037', 'subtract', 'androidandme.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating-pro/', '5_16_')" title="Vote Down" >Thumb down</a> <span id="karma-11037-total" >0</span></div><p>To the best of my knowledge, the only devices that were regularly updated were the Dream and the Magic. Dream and Magic both happen to be regular stock Android phones, but they are NOT the only ones. The Galaxy is still stuck with 1.5, disproving this theory.</p>
<p>So, why did these two phones get updated? Could be because, y&#8217;know, they happen to be the dev phones. They are ADP1, Ion, and also ADP2 now. So they have a very natural priority, as pretty much everyone working at Google on Android should have gotten at least one of these for free, and would be using it as their personal test hardware. As such, they will certainly solve any problems that prevents them from doing the testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

