<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google releases source code for Android 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/</link>
	<description>Meet Your New Android Friend.  Your Community For All Things Google Android.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:12:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andriano</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-22563</link>
		<dc:creator>Andriano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-22563</guid>
		<description>2.0 as 1.5 and 1.6 C++ coding quality sucks. Retarded mixture between procedural (aka C) style using global and static variables and code composition, and suffocated aspiration towards object oriented makes the code unbelievable. I took a look in audio and surface flinger and I my blood pressure started in notime to rush up. The un professionalism could be sees in each line of code. There is no begining and no end, no concept, no design. Grab cscope utilityy and run it on some /frameworks/ code project to get a class diagram,... better not; be happy as you are because after such an experiment  you wont be. 
I am wondering; the guys that can defecate such code, what do they have in their heads! Who&#039;s managing this? 
Anyway, who cares, about what is not being seen, with money you can make a car running with shit, no mater how slow and how big and how much shit will eat per mile , and google has it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.0 as 1.5 and 1.6 C++ coding quality sucks. Retarded mixture between procedural (aka C) style using global and static variables and code composition, and suffocated aspiration towards object oriented makes the code unbelievable. I took a look in audio and surface flinger and I my blood pressure started in notime to rush up. The un professionalism could be sees in each line of code. There is no begining and no end, no concept, no design. Grab cscope utilityy and run it on some /frameworks/ code project to get a class diagram,&#8230; better not; be happy as you are because after such an experiment  you wont be.<br />
I am wondering; the guys that can defecate such code, what do they have in their heads! Who&#8217;s managing this?<br />
Anyway, who cares, about what is not being seen, with money you can make a car running with shit, no mater how slow and how big and how much shit will eat per mile , and google has it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinach</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-14760</link>
		<dc:creator>spinach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-14760</guid>
		<description>Well that sucks hard
I use a g1 too, and flash is a big part of my day to day browsing. Flash will require a-2.0 and since my phone doesn&#039;t support it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that sucks hard<br />
I use a g1 too, and flash is a big part of my day to day browsing. Flash will require a-2.0 and since my phone doesn&#8217;t support it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reese</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-12011</link>
		<dc:creator>Reese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-12011</guid>
		<description>I love my G1, and I don&#039;t want to quit my contract, but are there any hopes of getting the Android 2.0 update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my G1, and I don&#8217;t want to quit my contract, but are there any hopes of getting the Android 2.0 update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris janota</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-11639</link>
		<dc:creator>chris janota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-11639</guid>
		<description>The awesome has nothing on Google Android. google maps navigator is fantastic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The awesome has nothing on Google Android. google maps navigator is fantastic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adobe Flash 10.1 to require Android 2.0 &#8211; Android and Me</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-11034</link>
		<dc:creator>Adobe Flash 10.1 to require Android 2.0 &#8211; Android and Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-11034</guid>
		<description>[...] beliefs that Android 2.0 will in fact be required for Adobe&#8217;s Flash Player. The Android 2.0 source code is now available to everyone, but handset makers still need to update their device drivers to work with the latest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] beliefs that Android 2.0 will in fact be required for Adobe&#8217;s Flash Player. The Android 2.0 source code is now available to everyone, but handset makers still need to update their device drivers to work with the latest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-11015</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-11015</guid>
		<description>well htc ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well htc &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-11014</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-11014</guid>
		<description>lets say the G1 is packed and cant hold the Eclair update . what if  google can create there own custom firmware for G1 users and offer updates kinda like cyanogen but legit from android and google.. its just an idea so please no insults.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets say the G1 is packed and cant hold the Eclair update . what if  google can create there own custom firmware for G1 users and offer updates kinda like cyanogen but legit from android and google.. its just an idea so please no insults.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Martinez</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-11006</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-11006</guid>
		<description>so the question still remains, am I as a G1 Tmobile user gonna see and Android 2.0 update on my phone anytime soon? or am i gonna have to cut my two year contract tha im barely a year into short, and sign up with verizon to get the Droid? personally id rather stick with my G1 because i love HTC and full keyboard, id rather not get a MyTouch if thats the only tmobile phone that can handle the 2.0 update. please let me know of any rumors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so the question still remains, am I as a G1 Tmobile user gonna see and Android 2.0 update on my phone anytime soon? or am i gonna have to cut my two year contract tha im barely a year into short, and sign up with verizon to get the Droid? personally id rather stick with my G1 because i love HTC and full keyboard, id rather not get a MyTouch if thats the only tmobile phone that can handle the 2.0 update. please let me know of any rumors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biork</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-10957</link>
		<dc:creator>biork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-10957</guid>
		<description>Eclair, mmmm ! I love french pastry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eclair, mmmm ! I love french pastry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://androidandme.com/2009/11/news/google-releases-source-code-for-android-2-0/#comment-10948</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://androidandme.com/?p=7495#comment-10948</guid>
		<description>Clearly &quot;can wait&quot; - should be &quot;Can&#039;t wait&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly &#8220;can wait&#8221; &#8211; should be &#8220;Can&#8217;t wait&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
